商业研究

• 绿色经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国工业生态全要素能源效率异质性研究 ——基于SBM-Undesirable和Meta-frontier模型的分析

陈平1,罗艳2   

  1. 中南财经政法大学 1.经济学院;2.财政税务学院,武汉 430073
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-27 出版日期:2017-04-18
  • 作者简介:陈平(1988-),男,广西百色人,中南财经政法大学经济学院博士研究生,研究方向:人口、资源与环境经济学;罗艳(1987-),女,广西桂林人,中南财经政法大学财政税务学院博士研究生,研究方向:区域经济学、财政学。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目,项目编号:71603281;国家社会科学基金项目,项目编号:15BMZ080;国家社会科学基金项目,项目编号:13BJL088。

Research on the Heterogeneity of China′s Industrial Ecological Total Factor Energy Efficiency-An Analysis based on SBM-Undesirable and Meta-frontier Model

CHEN Ping1,LUO Yan2   

  1. 1.School of Economics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073,China;2. School of Public Finance and Taxation, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073,China
  • Received:2016-11-27 Online:2017-04-18

摘要: 为了克服以往区域经济研究中的生产技术异质性问题,采用 SBM-Undesirable 模型和 Meta-frontier 生产函数测算我国30个省市2004-2014年的工业生态全要素能源效率,同时采用“共同技术比率”测算各地区能源利用的技术差距,并从“管理无效率”和“技术无效率”两个维度分析能源利用无效率的来源及其影响因素。总体上看,我国三大群组共同前沿生态全要素能源效率(MTE)和共同技术比率(MTR)区域差异较为明显,呈现出“东-中-西”依次递减的格局,而群组前沿生态全要素能源效率(GTE)呈现出“西-中-东”依次递减的格局;生态全要素能源利用无效率均值分解来看,东部群组能源利用无效率是因为管理无效率造成的,中部群组技术无效率和管理无效率同时显著存在,而西部群组技术无效率最为明显,产业结构、对外开放、研发投入、环境规制、政府干预对生态全要素能源效率产生显著而有差异的影响。

关键词: 生态全要素能源效率, SBM-Undesirable模型, 共同前沿函数, 共同技术比率

Abstract: In order to overcome the problem of heterogeneity of production technology in the past regional economic research, the SBM Undesirable model and Metafrontier production function are applied to calculate the ecological total factor energy efficiency of 30 provinces in China during 2004-2014 .At the same time, the paper uses “common technical ratio” to measure the technological gap of energy utilization in different regions, and analyzes the sources and influence factors of energy inefficiency from “management inefficiency”and “technology inefficiency” two dimensions. On the whole, there exist obvious regional differences in the common frontier ecological total factor energy efficiency (MTE) and common technical ratio (MTR)in the three groups of China, showing the “East-Middle-West” descending pattern; in three groups, the ranking of the group frontier ecological total factor energy efficiency (GTE) from high to low is West, Middle and East; from the decomposition of the mean value of ecological total factor energy efficiency, the inefficient energy use in the eastern group is due to the inefficiency of management, in central group the inefficiency of technical and management are both significant, while in the western group technical inefficiency is the most obvious, the industrial structure, opening up, R&D investment, environmental regulation, government intervention have significant and different impacts on the ecological total factor energy efficiency.

Key words: ecological total factor energy efficiency, SBM-Undesirable model, common frontier function model, common technical ratio