An Analysis of the Policy Effect of “Replacing Business Tax with Value- added Tax”
on Investment Efficiency based on the Perspective of Financing Constraints
QianXiaodong
(School of Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China)
QianXiaodong. An Analysis of the Policy Effect of “Replacing Business Tax with Value- added Tax”
on Investment Efficiency based on the Perspective of Financing Constraints[J]. 商业研究.
注释:
① “1+6”行业包括交通运输业以及研发、信息技术、文化创意、物流辅助、有形动产租赁、鉴证咨询这6类现代服务业;最后一批实施“营改增”的4类行业包括建筑业、房地产业、金融业和生活服务业。
②本文将制造业排除在对照组之外的原因如下:“营改增”改革之后,制造业通过与上下游“1+6”行业的交易可以获得抵扣收益,间接受益于“营改增”政策,作为对照组的“噪音”较大。对比来看,最后一批实施“营改增”的行业在样本期间既不能直接涉及“营改增”改革,也不能享受中间投入带来的抵扣收益,“噪音”较小,更符合对照组选取的要求。
参考文献:
[1]Barro R J. Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991, 106(2):407-443.
[2]喻坤,李治国,张晓蓉,徐剑刚. 企业投资效率之谜——融资约束假说与货币政策冲击[J].经济研究,2014(5):106-120.
[3]万华林,朱凯,陈信元.税制改革与公司投资价值相关性[J].经济研究,2012(3):65-75.
[4]罗宏,陈丽霖. 增值税转型对企业融资约束的影响研究[J].会计研究,2012(12):43-49.
[5]Jensen M C. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers [J]. American Economic Review, 1986,7:323-329.
[6]王跃堂,王亮亮,彭洋. 控制权性质影响税收敏感性吗?——基于企业劳动力需求的检验[J].经济研究,2012(4):52-63.
[7]Richardson S. Over-investment of Free Cash Flow [J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2006,11(2-3):159-189.
[8]Kaplan S, Zingales L. Do Investment-cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints? [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997,112(1):169-215.
[9]王亮亮. 市场危机冲击、融资约束与公司避税[J].南开管理评论,2016(1):155-168.
[10]Dickinson V. Cash Flow Patterns As A Proxy for Firm Life Cycle [J]. Accounting Review, 2011, 86(6):1969-1994.
[11]乔睿蕾,陈良华. 税负转嫁能力对“营改增”政策效应的影响——基于现金—现金流敏感性视角的检验[J].中国工业经济,2017(6):117-135.
[12]Chen S, Sun Z, Tong S, et al. Government Intervention and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from China[J].Journal of Corporate Finance, 2011,17:259-271.